Search for: "Miller v. State of California"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Indeed, China is about as far away from New York as France is from California. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Indeed, China is about as far away from New York as France is from California. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Decision in full:United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:40 am
"What the state of Texas has done in this case is imputable in law to the U.S. and engages the United States' international responsibility," she said. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
” We will be watching for the Ninth Circuit’s decision and will report it to you. - Randy Miller and Sava Berhane [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Alas, Ronald V. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:50 pm
In the 1973 Supreme Court case of Miller v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Network v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
[Pero; Severino] California high school tripped up by overbroad state child porn law. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:08 pm
Professor Miller recommends that: if you are looking for a solid case that delves into many of these topics, you could do a lot worse than the recent opinion of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:42 am
In Henderson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Danney, Comment, Sacking CEQA: how NFL stadium developers may have tackled the California Environmental Quality Act, 19 PENN STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 131 (2011)Carolyn Davis, Note, Leave it on the field: too expansive approach to evaluating Title IX compliance in Biediger v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:02 am
The court relied on the recent very significant appellate decision Kwikset v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
A raft of California intermediate appellate decisions applies the learned intermediary rule to medical devices. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:03 pm
(Eugene Volokh) That’s unconstitutional, says a Ninth Circuit panel in yesterday’s Williams v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:26 am
Regents of the University of California, a challenge to a California law that gives in-state tuition to illegal immigrants. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:31 pm
California, 480 U.S. 102, 112 (1987). [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:35 am
Remember Rudovsky v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:46 am
On May 4, 2010, a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals killed Hollywood by holding that implied contracts for the sale of ideas that were previously protected under California state law (pitch meetings for films) were preempted by the Copyright Act. [read post]
