Search for: "PROPERTIES FOUR, INC. v. State" Results 1201 - 1220 of 1,989
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2012, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "The complaint alleges five causes of action - the first four with respect to the signatories to the agreement. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 12:58 pm by Juan Antunez
Coastal Utils., Inc., 814 So.2d 1227, 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (stating that “the withdrawing joint tenant is liable to the joint owner for that person's share of the withdrawn funds”). [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:47 am by James F. McDonough, Jr.
The Supreme Court created a four part test in 1977 in Complete Auto Transit, Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
” It cites Basic Inc v Levinson (1988) for the proposition that “information is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision or if the information would significantly alter the total mix of information made available. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:18 am by Don Cruse
Legal Newsline reports: “Texas SC orders judge to clarify why he disregarded verdict” about IN RE UNITED SCAFFOLDING, INC., No. 10-0526 The Texas Tribune writes: “Texas Sees Rising Tide of Property-Rights Cases”, which while discussing larger trends, mentions “four decisions on land-use issues” from August 31, as well as TEXAS RICE LAND PARTNERS, LTD. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Hallock v State of New York, supra; Kelley v Chavez, 33 AD3d 590 [2006]; Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:30 pm by Robert Wagner
Contending that the press release and lawsuit were shams designed to harm TASER’s stock and business, TASER brought another lawsuit against Stinger—Taser International, Inc. v. [read post]