Search for: "Patrick v. Patrick" Results 1201 - 1220 of 3,625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 6:35 am by Serafini, Michalowski, Derkacz
There were a number of very interesting and useful sessions dealing with the Supreme Court's Metlife v Glenn decision and how it is impacting cases across the country as well as various other in depth discussions on a number of relevant issues. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:29 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Patrick Bannon Last week, Oxford Health Plans filed its opening brief with the Supreme Court in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Shoppes, LLC, 775 F3d 789 [6th Cir 2015]; In re Stinnett, 465 F3d 309 [7th Cir 2006]; In re Vote, 276 F3d 1024 [8th Cir 2002]; In re Mwangi, 764 F3d 1168 [9th Cir 2014]; Patrick A. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:41 am by INFORRM
The 2004 decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2004] 2 AC 457) was a significant case regarding privacy, and for human rights law and tort law more generally. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 5:47 pm
Patrick Leahy and Harry Reid voted for it. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 pm by T. Greg Doucette
—===— From the law:/dev/null archives: Life Comes at You Fast (Part V) (10/09/15) [this post] Life Comes at You Fast (Part IV) (08/17/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part III) (05/28/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part II) (05/25/15) Life Comes at You Fast (Part I) (05/22/15) Seriously, these things are now industry standards! [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
 And at the New York Times, Patrick McGeehan looks back at Kelo v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
For example, in Hanahoe v Hussey [1998] 3 IR 69, [1997] IEHC 173 (14 November 1997) and Gray v Minister for Justice [2007] 2 IR 654, [2007] IEHC 52 (17 January 2007) (extensively discussed here, here, and here), the plaintiffs recovered damages in respect of leaks by Gardaí of their private information. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on the Court’s decision in Luna Torres v. [read post]