Search for: "People v. Grand"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Crabtree v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:15 pm
iRacing v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
The case, known as Furman v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
” In 1972, in Apodaca v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:35 am
Trump v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
" The recent Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the action.When in the now-celebrated case of Marbury v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:26 am
It is also worth noting that pursuant to the decision in State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:15 am
Remember State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:11 am
Most people probably don’t know, but the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:05 am
"There are few people who can speak with greater credibility on this case than Stuart. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:16 pm
Correction Law Article 6-C, the Sex Offender Registration Act, effective 21 January 1996, modeled after New Jersey's "Megan's Law", was meant to address the need to protect the public from the risk of repeat offenses by perpetrators of sex crimes, deemed inherently susceptible to recidivism as held in People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 2:20 am
In People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d 140 (1996), the Court of Appeals considered a trial court’s failure to hold such a hearing after it was requested by the defendant, as well as the lack of necessary evidence supporting the finding that the State of New York had had losses of at least $500,000 due to the defendant’s fraudulent Medicaid billing. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
" Stringfellow v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 10:33 pm
The recent California Court of Appeal case of People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 2:20 am
In People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d 140 (1996), the Court of Appeals considered a trial court’s failure to hold such a hearing after it was requested by the defendant, as well as the lack of necessary evidence supporting the finding that the State of New York had had losses of at least $500,000 due to the defendant’s fraudulent Medicaid billing. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:37 am
He said the morning after the release of the opinion in Texas v. [read post]
