Search for: "People v. Polite"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 13,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Castellano, 41 AD3d 184, 185; People v Carter, 40 AD3d 1310, 1312). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 1:09 pm
Civil Liberties Union, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 pm
Part #2: Progress v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Under this “classification-rather-than-class-of-persons” approach, if race is a problematic basis for sorting people (because its use historically has generated socio-political costs) in cases like Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Motorola Sols., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
But it also means that if some people do less to reduce emissions than expected, someone else will have to make up the shortfall. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
It’s a system which has generally worked well over the years and is a world away from, say, the absurdity of politically appointed judges in the USA. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:09 am
As for Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm
It is also noteworthy that he joined the Court in 1988, exactly 30 years ago, the kind of round number people often like for bringing careers to a close. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Five years ago, in Kiobel v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:32 am
My friend Steve Landsburg appears to have entered a competition with my friend John Lott over who can make the most politically incorrect argument. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:57 am
Compare how Swift v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:10 pm
In King v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:10 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Or take Frisby v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
Bond v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
The wheel of politics turns at the UN â€" with the UN itself as the constant. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:57 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 5:23 pm
Is a private business’s refusing to serve people based on their political affiliation legal? [read post]