Search for: "People v. West"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 3,244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
There are lots of young, fit, good-looking people playing volleyball or working out. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:38 pm
Hager v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Bobby Scott (D-Va.) in the Zubik v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
They do make claims for themselves, but not ownership or origination claims even though they might be adding creativity the west would consider copyrightable. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:44 am
The case pitted the American Public Health Association v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
U-Haul Co. of West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 3:32 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 3:32 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 9:02 am
The most important one is an obscure case called Stern v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
Sandford, and Plessy v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 3:09 pm
People who qualified for these benefits received up to an extra $600 a month in unemployment benefits. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am
Additionally, Judge Seeger then said the courts are not bound to follow decisions of equal or inferior courts, citing People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 12:10 am
Supreme Court case called Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
" (link to full Statesman-Journal article) 2) Read the September 30, 2009, State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:17 am
Here is the abstract:The Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:17 am
And he rightly points out that it raises the potential for conflicting judgments in cases involving former Chadian dictator Habré -- not necessarily the 2009 decision of the African Court of Human and People's Rights about which we've posted, but rather the eventual judgment in Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. [read post]
