Search for: "People v. Young"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 4,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm
Here the quoted cases were White v Samsung, Wendt v Host International and Douglas v Mattel. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 3:47 am
Nonetheless, retired federal Judge Shira Scheindlin gives it a go, and she comes with the cred of having been the judge in Floyd v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm
[H]undreds of young people live solely off goods they are able to liberate from private enterprise and funds they manage to extract from the Government. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 12:26 am
On April 16, there were 476 people known to be on board SEWOL. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:13 am
"In 2005, in Roper v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 2:31 pm
I do not doubt that when used as a label on merchandise for young women it may vaguely suggest some connection with the magazine to some people. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
It has been hailed as one of the most important civil-rights decisions for people with disabilities. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:55 am
The fact that the New York City Police Department has openly and flagrantly chosen to ignore DeBour (that's the New York flavor of Terry v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 4:02 pm
On February 15, 1990 the case of the People of the State of New York, Respondent v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 11:28 am
In Sarti v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 11:28 am
In Sarti v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm
The court of appeals relied on the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in Ginsberg v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:30 pm
Each story unfolds along boundaries—between men and women, slave and free, black and white, rich and poor, old and young—as rigid social orders are upset in ways that drive people into the courtroom. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm
[1] Stephenson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:36 pm
Danvers and R. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:37 am
Arizona v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:03 am
UPS The ADAAA, Young v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
” The Young Turks offers a video commentary on the decision. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:43 am
Young v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
It is arguably a necessary power in order to meet the contingencies that arise over time.In the leading American case, Jackson v. [read post]