Search for: "Prince v. State"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
Here the state adopts an approach emblematic of private governance. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:30 am
What makes it marginal is not Texas v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am
Seng v. the TMO On 20 February 2019, the TMO rejected the trade mark application (Decision [2019] No. 34784, ‘the TMO’s decision’) for violating Article 10.1(8) of the Trade Mark Law of China (TML, 2013 Amendment),* an absolute ground for refusal and invalidity that applies when a sign is ‘detrimental to socialist morality or mores or having any other adverse effect’. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
There is not a lot of precedent in this area (but see one of our favorites, Online Policy Group v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:18 am
Princess Caroline’s new application to the court appears to be something of a repeat of her previous case, as it concerns the publication, without her consent, of photographs of her and her husband, Prince Ernst August von Hannover, and stories about her private life. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
The notice names one Allan V. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:09 pm
NEA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am
And it’s named after an inspiring figure: Raymond V. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:22 am
Loewy’s article Why Roe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am
The case ultimately ruled in Google’s favor, stating that the project was transformative and constituted fair use. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm
They exist because remnants of fallen princely states were unevenly absorbed by the British Raj. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
