Search for: "Roll v. Roll" Results 1201 - 1220 of 6,809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Ouzenne argues that relying on the tax rolls to determine value was a gross mistake because tax rolls are no evidence of actual value. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:00 am by Sever | Storey
Supreme Court decision that requires exhausting state remedies first (Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:42 pm by Lara
Related Posts: Geekview IP Weeks(ish) in Review Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises Only in Hollywood? [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:44 pm
  That changed yesterday.The Supreme Court issued it's decision in Rivera v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:05 pm
He was also accused of misconduct for refusing to participate in a scheduled roll-out, purposefully delaying a work assignment, and being uncooperative and confrontational during the roll-out of a new program. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:09 am by CMS
On 1, 2 and 3 February 2022, the Supreme Court heard the appeals in (i) Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Compton Beauchamp Estates Ltd (the “Compton Beauchamp Appeal”); (ii) Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure v Ashloch Ltd & Anor (the “Ashloch Appeal”); and (iii) On Tower UK Ltd v AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd (the “On Tower Appeal”). [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:44 am by uwlegalscholarship
Submissions will be reviewed on a rolling basis beginning September 1, 2010; the submission deadline is October 11, 2010. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:51 am
Wer ist der Gastgeber, und welche Rolle spielt er? [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:01 am
It approaches this age-old problem through the lens of SongByrd, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  The court (Justice Flick, who also decided the MPEG LA v Regency Media case at first instance, in which he was soundly rolled on appeal) has now handed down its decision, finding that the ACCC failed to establish that Pfizer had acted contrary to section 46 or 47 of the CCA, and thus that Pfizer’s strategy is not contrary to Australian competition law. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:11 am by Unknown
Hoopa Valley Tribe (Clean Water Act) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlSwiger v. [read post]