Search for: "STATE v BUSH"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 4,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
The administration's policy could potentially offset some of the negative effects of the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:31 pm
One can contrast Estrada’s reaction to that of Neal Katyal, who, after being successful in Hamdan, said: I don't think that this [decision] is a rebuke to the Bush administration per se…. [read post]
13 May 2021, 12:23 pm
Cheaneau, whereas the conservative judges appointed by presidents from the Republican Party (i.e., Bush and Trump) are likely to be predisposed against him.But there's a bit of a wrinkle here. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:51 am
The case, Snyder v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
But, while all that was going on President Bush nominated Mr. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:37 pm
Yesterday we wrote you to share the news as soon as we heard about our tremendous victory in the Supreme Court and to thank you for all your support. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:50 am
Last evening, the Georgetown Law Supreme Court Institute and the Center for Constitutional Rights sponsored at panel discussion, The Future of Habeas Corpus and Executive Power, that took an in-depth look at today's arguments before the U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
375,531 GROUP 52 RUNOFF Carol "Jodie" Breece v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm
Carrion v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 7:55 pm
On September 9, 2008, the Third Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 2:52 pm
United States DOJ, 2009 U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:27 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court called for the views of the Solicitor General about a certiorari petition filed in Golden Gate Restaurant Association v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:57 pm
Medellin v Texas,(March 25, 2008), the United States Supreme Court ruled that President Bush did not have authority to require the State of Texas to enforce the Vienna Convention. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:08 am
Legal scholars believe the High Court will take up either the California or the Utah case.The case from California features two heavy-hitting lawyers: Ted Olson and David Boies of Bush v Gore 2000 fame; they have joined forces for this epic civil rights struggle. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 2:49 pm
And it looks like there will be election litigation that will make Bush v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 12:42 pm
The real concern here is whether this case will end up re-writing the actual malice rule of New York Times v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:13 am
Green hasn't read McCall v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
On May 15, 2006, the United States Supreme Court decided the Sereboff v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Gamble v. [read post]
