Search for: "STATE v COOL"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2009, 3:49 pm
No. 15), the Court announced they changed the test to conform with the 2006 United States Supreme Court case Brigham City v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:46 am
“(iv) The term ‘harvesting’ includes washing, trimming of outer leaves of, and cooling produce. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:02 am
Thanks, Matthew, says the IPKat, for taking the trouble to write in and to elucidate the current state of play in this obvious area of IP v free speech so neatly.Free speech hereWords are cheap hereWords are cheep here [for those who sincerely believe that all music in 1971 was cool]Expensive speech here [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 4:32 am
That's cool; the paparazzi can get on your nerves after a while. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 4:32 am
That's cool; the paparazzi can get on your nerves after a while. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
On June 19, 2009, in Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 10:49 pm
Gemtron v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:14 pm
Gemtron Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Underwood is an associate professor at Baylor University School of Law in Waco, Texas.That's cool. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 1:41 pm
It's all about whether you can remove appeals of state administrative decisions. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
" 12:40: Sotomayor seems much more cool and easygoing today. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
See Wells v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:38 am
As this Court stated in Cruz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:03 pm
Jammie Thomas Conservative Think Tank: RIAA v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 11:07 pm
blog in which he discusses at length and in at least three parts, his handling of the case of State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Kitson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
The opinion is Farrell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 6:32 am
I mentioned earlier that an important finding in Entergy v. [read post]
