Search for: "STATE v. GEAR"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2008, 7:45 am
Bell Issue: Whether a federal habeas claim is "procedurally defaulted" because it has been presented twice to the state courts, and whether a federal habeas court is powerless to recognize that a state court erred in holding that state law precludes reviewing a claim. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:14 am
Spoerle v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:41 am
See, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem seeks to reopen stayed patent… [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:55 pm
The owner also maintained that Philadelphia zoning ordinances do not specifically prohibit sexual activity on the premises.The majority challenged MAJ's attempt to prove its first argument by citing as precedent a case where the state Supreme Court ruled that off-track betting was an accessory use to a restaurant. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:55 am
In Mempa v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:48 pm
With a 7-2 ruling ending a moratorium on state-sanctioned killing, states across the country are gearing up to resume executions. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 7:29 pm
United States (07-330), involving appellate judges' ability to increase sentences sua sponte, and Irizarry v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:00 pm
., the Utah Court of Appeals held in 14th Street Gym, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:17 am
Alvarez and Tum v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:40 am
See Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
Boris may even get onto mad Japanese TV… and Top Gear. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
, Chamber of Commerce v Brown (are state rules about the use of state funds preempted by the NLRA?) [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 4:14 am
Spoerle v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Additionally, if the proposal was included in the proxy statement, the board would have had an opportunity to state its reasons for opposition. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
As a big federal agency, you need a little time to get your act in gear. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 8:01 pm
Here's what THEY SAY: "The Supreme Court decision in the Banks & Banaitis v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 7:27 pm
About 12 hours from the time I am writing this post, the Supreme Court will finally hear oral arguments in Baze v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:49 am
Network v. [read post]
