Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 1201 - 1220 of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
United States - addressing whether a federal court of appeals may increase a criminal defendant's sentence in the absence of a cross-appeal by the government. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Margaret Sachs
    Why not allow these investors to sue in United States courts? [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:40 am by Guest Blogger
United States issued last Thursday, has quickly received a fair amount of buzz in the blogosphere. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:59 pm
§856; Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, Part II, Ch. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:25 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in United State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:36 am by Rory Little
United States to allow a redaction that replaced Greene’s name with blanks in his non-testifying codefendants’ statements. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Indeed, it is not unthinkable that Antonin Scalia believes that "sovereign states" within the US have such a right, as the US Supreme Court suggested in the 1837 case Mayor of New York v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:56 pm by Josh Douglas
United States, 2013 WL 3306410 (C.I.T. 2013). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:01 am by David
 Justice Scalia wrote “While the jurisprudence of this court has sometimes sanctioned a ‘living Constitution, it has never approved a living United States Code. [read post]
The United States Supreme Court has upheld an Administrator’s Opinion issued by the United States Department of Labor stating that “typical” mortgage-loan officers are not covered by the Administrative exemption to the FLSA’s overtime requirements. [read post]
The United States Supreme Court has upheld an Administrator’s Opinion issued by the United States Department of Labor stating that “typical” mortgage-loan officers are not covered by the Administrative exemption to the FLSA’s overtime requirements. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am by Amy Howe
  In United States v. [read post]