Search for: "Square v. State"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 5,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2020, 5:45 pm
In the case of Studio Monitori and Others v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
In State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 12:02 pm
” Fellner v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:00 am
Longanacre v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 8:32 pm
Per Lowery v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Town of Greece v. [read post]
10 May 2025, 7:18 am
The fate of the administrative state turns on the 1935 case Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:01 am
An individual should never carry the burden of proving innocence when squaring off against the State in any criminal proceeding. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that it was unlawful and a “serious abuse of power” for the Home Office to follow an unpublished policy on the detention of foreign national prisoners which contradicted its published policy. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
For example, Gale’s Application claimed an improved method for calculating square roots, to be implemented in ROM. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 7:25 am
Case citation: Johnson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm
ShareDuring Tuesday’s oral argument in Cruz v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:19 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Shady Grove v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 3:45 pm
The first in time rule, cited in Harcar v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 5:19 am
She wasn’t exactly an empathetic Latina on the bench in Foley Square. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
That question is squarely within the purview of the judiciary. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
The case, Thaler v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
The court granted vacatur under United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm
The first case to address the issue squarely under California law was Atmel Corp. v. [read post]