Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 1201 - 1220 of 7,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
Originating in 2005, Kensington International Limited v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:52 am
”  The Act defines “International Insurance Agreements on Prudential Matters” as a written agreement between the United States and one or more foreign governments, authorities or regulatory entities with respect to prudential measurers concerning the business of insurance or reinsurance.For the complete text of the Act (see pages 304 through 341 for Title V), click here.We will continue to monitor the Act and provide updates on InsureReinsure.com. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:07 pm by Timothy J. Maier
For now, business method patents live on, and United States patent law remains mostly unchanged by the decision in Bilski v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:32 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Thousands of Whistleblowers At-Risk of Losing Protection WASHINGTON, DC – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, November 28, 2017 — The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in a major precedent setting whistleblower case, Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:00 am by Dale B. Halling
While the Supreme Court has done away with the "useful, concrete and tangible result" test from State Street Bank v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:28 am by Will Baude
Shortly after the founding, the United States created a corporation called the Bank of the United States, famously discussed in McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am by John Mikhail
  Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:50 am by EitanBA
Comerica Bank – Protecting Consumers Against Mishandled Electronic Funds  The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently issued an order in the case of Sparkman v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 1:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Trends in arbitrationOn October 24, 2017, the United States Senate, by a 51-50 vote, approved H.J.Res. 111 providing for congressional disapproval under Chapter 8 of Title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Arbitration Agreements. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:01 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clinton, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2 (17 January 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Royal Bank of Scotland v Revenue And Customs [2012] EWHC 9 (Ch) (17 January 2012) Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch) (11 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thomas Brown Estates Ltd v Hunters Partners Ltd [2012] EWHC 30 (QB) (17 January 2012) Legal Services Commission v Loomba… [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by ernst
Despite lots of its own inconsistency, the Supreme Court adopted this view in 1866 in United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
United States 1984) and barns (United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 10:32 am by James Hamilton
One obvious provision is Section 604, which amends the Bank Holding Company Act to direct the Federal Reserve to consider, when it evaluates an application for approval of a proposed acquisition, merger, or consolidation, whether it would result in greater or more concentrated risks to the stability of the United States banking or financial system. [read post]