Search for: "State v House"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 28,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm
R (Jakimaviciute) v LB Hammersmith and Fulham [2013] EWHC 4372 (Admin) [Not generally available yet. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm
R (Jakimaviciute) v LB Hammersmith and Fulham [2013] EWHC 4372 (Admin) [Not generally available yet. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:49 am
CBS Broadcasting, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 5:36 am
The Supreme Court ruled in Payton v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 7:14 pm
Styller v Zoning Board of Appeals of Lynnfield, 487 Mass. 588 (MA 6/7/2021) [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 9:55 am
I will grant that Article V appears to the contrary, using "both" to describe separate votes: The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution…. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:59 am
In Okwedy v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 6:47 pm
For this case to be similar to Missouri v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 8:09 pm
This suggests that, if next week’s elections yield pro-Article V majorities in both houses, we could easily see an Article V convention without Article V’s prerequisites being met. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:27 pm
In Sterling Park v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 5:20 am
In the R-1B district, the principal permitted uses are single family detached dwelling and houses of worship. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:17 pm
In so holding, the district court looked to legislative history provided by a House of Representatives report which addresses the changes made to section 523(a)(1). [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:53 am
Cook v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:19 pm
But yesterday's decision in Davis v. [read post]
