Search for: "State v. Austin" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,922
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2012, 11:32 am by John McFarland
This week, the Texas Supreme Court denied Denbury Green Pipeline's motion for rehearing in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 10:13 am
[ILB note] Judge Riley also wrote the Jan. 9, 2007 majority opinion in Austin Elliot, et al v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Joshua Thompson
  Today, as reported by the Northwest Austin Court, “[v]oter turnout and registration rates … approach parity. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
The triumphalism extended to the majority’s view that it had imposed coherence on the unwieldy body of campaign finance jurisprudence by excising an “outlier” 1990 opinion, Austin v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by Lawrence Solum
The triumphalism extended to the majority’s view that it had imposed coherence on the unwieldy body of campaign finance jurisprudence by excising an “outlier” 1990 opinion, Austin v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:47 am by Lawrence Solum
The triumphalism extended to the majority’s view that it had imposed coherence on the unwieldy body of campaign finance jurisprudence by excising an “outlier” 1990 opinion, Austin v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:45 pm
Today, the IRS issued Notice 2014-19, which provides guidance on how qualified retirement plans should treat the marriages of same-sex couples following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:50 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Once elected, directors will serve a full term from April 2022 – April 2025 [Original emphasis and internal links to members-only pages omitted.]Here are the nominees along links to any information published on the Ombuds Blog:2021–2024 Director TermSuzanne Diviney, CO-OP, Vice President, Office of the Ombuds Lead, Pfizer Inc.Thomas Griffin, Ombudsperson, UCLA Health and Health Sciences, University of California, Los AngelesJennifer Mahony, Ombuds Office Director, Boston Children's… [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 2:26 pm
Austin, on appeal from the County Court, contended that Brent v Knightly predated the HRA and is not compliant with Art 1 Protocol 1 of the ECHR: Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. [read post]