Search for: "State v. Board of Education"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 5,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2025, 2:02 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
Quite to the contrary, 'the vigilant protection of constitutional freedoms is nowhere more vital than in the community of American schools.'"; and WHEREAS in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
All parties, the schools districts, the Wyoming Education Association, the Association of School Boards and the State of Wyoming, appealed various findings by the district court concerning whether the legislative and administrative actions of the state had satisfied the Supreme Court's mandate in State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
All parties, the schools districts, the Wyoming Education Association, the Association of School Boards and the State of Wyoming, appealed various findings by the district court concerning whether the legislative and administrative actions of the state had satisfied the Supreme Court's mandate in State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
As the California Supreme Court stated in Cobbs v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing §3813(2–b) of New York State’s Education Law, the Circuit Court pointed out that a lawsuit against a Board of Education is subject to a one-year statute of limitations. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing §3813(2–b) of New York State’s Education Law, the Circuit Court pointed out that a lawsuit against a Board of Education is subject to a one-year statute of limitations. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
************************************* Every board now knows its company will fall victim to a cyber-attack, and even worse, that the board will need to clean up the mess and superintend the fallout. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" Finding that "in light of all of the circumstances of this case, the penalty of termination is not irrational and does not shock the conscience," the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should not have granted that branch of the Plaintiff's petition seeking to vacate the penalty of termination of the Plaintiff's employment as a tenured teacher.* Citing Matter of Watkins v Board of Educ. of Port Jefferson Union Free School Dist., 26… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" Finding that "in light of all of the circumstances of this case, the penalty of termination is not irrational and does not shock the conscience," the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should not have granted that branch of the Plaintiff's petition seeking to vacate the penalty of termination of the Plaintiff's employment as a tenured teacher.* Citing Matter of Watkins v Board of Educ. of Port Jefferson Union Free School Dist., 26… [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:18 am
On November 13, 2014, the Third Appellate District in Earl v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
In Elmsford UFSD v Alfred G. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:42 am
Louis University v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
Vermont State Board of Education, 2020 VT 52. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of O'Reilly v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of O'Reilly v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:02 am
Circuit had also previously used this language, and Fischbach cites the general rule that courts cannot serve as super-personnel boards. [read post]
