Search for: "State v. Board of Education"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 5,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
All parties, the schools districts, the Wyoming Education Association, the Association of School Boards and the State of Wyoming, appealed various findings by the district court concerning whether the legislative and administrative actions of the state had satisfied the Supreme Court's mandate in State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
All parties, the schools districts, the Wyoming Education Association, the Association of School Boards and the State of Wyoming, appealed various findings by the district court concerning whether the legislative and administrative actions of the state had satisfied the Supreme Court's mandate in State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:18 am
On November 13, 2014, the Third Appellate District in Earl v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
As the California Supreme Court stated in Cobbs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
In Elmsford UFSD v Alfred G. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
************************************* Every board now knows its company will fall victim to a cyber-attack, and even worse, that the board will need to clean up the mess and superintend the fallout. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
Vermont State Board of Education, 2020 VT 52. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:42 am
Louis University v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of O'Reilly v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of O'Reilly v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:02 am
Circuit had also previously used this language, and Fischbach cites the general rule that courts cannot serve as super-personnel boards. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Filburn (1942) and West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm
Board of Education, and after the political branches adopted formal civil-rights reforms in the 1960s. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
The Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Filburn (1942) and West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 3:19 pm
New York State Board of Regents, et al. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 6:26 pm
Board of Education to the subsequent per curiams, from Baker v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:10 pm
Board of Education), 410 (Roe v. [read post]