Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 1201 - 1220 of 13,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm by Josh Blackman
First, Roberts wrote a solo dissent in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” A recent decision from Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Robert R. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly… [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the (perhaps largely defunct) “Lemon test” from Lemon v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
Act § 1089[d] did not warrant reversal of change of permanency goal where  it heard extensive testimony regarding the child’s emotional state and best interests,             In Matter of Isayah R., 189 A.D.3d 1942 (3d Dept.,2021) respondent was the mother of a child (born in 2010) who had special needs. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
Amicus brief of United States Senator Thom Tillis, Honorable Paul R. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
On Monday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The words “family violence”, “domestic violence”, “intimate partner violence” and “coercive control” do not appear anywhere in the Federation of Law Societies of Canada Model Code of Professional Conduct. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am by Ben Millson (Bristows)
  The appeal also featured an intervention from the Secretary of State for Defence, who argued that the authorisation should be option (1). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly… [read post]