Search for: "State v. Fraction"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2008, 7:53 pm
State records showed that the number of hits to news and political blogs from state computers was a small fraction of the millions of hits received each day by mainstream news sites like the Lexington Herald-Leader, the New York Times, and CNN.com. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
State and local governments have the legal means and resources to take enforcement action and punish only a fraction of those they do discover. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:52 pm
There is a curious irony to Judge Weinstein's decision in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:37 am
The authority for this ruling is given as the Florida State Constitution, Article V, Section 1 (creating courts, and inherently empowering them) and Article II, Section 3 (separation of powers). [read post]
13 May 2008, 7:00 am
Hackett, DVM, MS, DACVECC; Steven V. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The case out of California, Marketing Information Masters v. the Board of Trustees of California State University reaches a rather predictable result in dismissing an allegation of copyright infringement on the grounds that states and state institutions are immune from lawsuits by private individuals and corporations. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:01 am
[18] NFL Enter. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:22 pm
Just when we might be resting on our Gall/Kimbrough/Regalado laurels, along comes United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:53 pm
United States). [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:46 pm
E.g., Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:21 am
" Opinion, p. 19 (quoting, United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:37 pm
In these states, commercial surrogacy contracts are defined as null, without legal significance. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 1:43 pm
See Tafas v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 7:32 am
The document also asks the court to consider the issue of punishment of children raised in Roper v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:15 pm
By Eric Goldman Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
., LLC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 1:26 pm
The latest I've seen is from the Indiana Court of Appeals, Isom v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
But on the ethical and constitutional side, at a minimum, I think that the obligees (lawyers) so massively benefit from the state-created, artificial monopoly granted to attorneys (e.g., through the UPL statutes) that they can't permissibly complain if one aspect of that state-created right is the obligation to provide a fraction of that benefit back in pro bono services. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
The recent Zandi v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Dept. v. [read post]
