Search for: "State v. Hurdle" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
The Court has also considered that as the advancement of gender equality is today a major goal in the member States of the Council of Europe, very weighty reasons would have to be put forward before such a difference of treatment could be regarded as compatible with the Convention (Konstantin Markin v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:41 pm
(The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Peterson v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:43 am
Allen (Stetson University College of Law) has published “Of Remedies, Juries and State Regulation of Punitive Damages: The Significance of Philip Morris v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by Daniel Wasserstein
In March of 2011, the Supreme Court of Florida issued a ruling in the case of Cohn v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by Daniel Wasserstein
”  In March of 2011, the Supreme Court of Florida issued a ruling in the case of Cohn v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:07 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The case of Ashcroft -v- Iqal involved the aftermath of the 9-11 terrorist attacks in 2001. [read post]
Conclusion With the initial motions to dismiss decided, it is likely that the next major hurdle in this litigation will be the question of class certification. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm by NL
Showing abuse of process must surely be a high hurdle to surmount. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm by NL
Showing abuse of process must surely be a high hurdle to surmount. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:52 pm by Joy Waltemath
As such, the rule could not clear even the Chevron step one hurdle and was unlawful. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
In limited circumstances like these, said the court, “the fundamental principle of access to courts must bow to the fact that a nation without sound intelligence is a nation at risk” (Abilt v. [read post]