Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 3,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 11:21 pm
The case of Patmainiece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions was reported in an earlier post. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
There has been previous comment here on the various stages of Banks v Cadwalladr, and the facts have been well-stated. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
A TRANSCRIPT OF THE COMMENTARY IN THE FIRST TELEVISED UK TRIAL R V KEVIN PIETERLAG AND JOHNNY ‘ROBBERS’ ROBBER Charon QC: Good morning everybody…Welcome to The Old Bailey on day one of a five day trial in the case of R v Kevin Pieterlag and Johnny ‘Robbers’ Robbers. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
So when a Court of Appeal decision was recently delivered in Hollister Incorporated and Dansac A/S v Medik Ostomy Supplies Limited [2012] EWCA 1419, she wiggled with excitement, made some peppermint tea with her beloved Tea Pigs and got to highlighting the 108 paragraph judgment delivered by Lord Justice Kitchin that held that His Honour Judge Birss QC was incorrect in the method by which he calculated Hollister's damages for trade mark infringement based… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Tang v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
" That led the court to a consideration of prior English case law as well of that of other EPC member states. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am
In R (GH) v The Mayor of London [2024] EWHC 1305 (Admin), the claimants, Charedi Orthodox children, sought permission to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Mayor of London to extend his Universal Free School Meals scheme for the academic year 2024-2025 but to continue to confine the scheme to state-funded primary schools. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:39 am
However, a Member of the House of Lords, Lord Holmes of Richmond, has proposed a Private Members’ Bill. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:17 am
Supreme Court Appeal On 2 February 2015 the trustee’s appeal was heard before Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
Today the Tenth Circuit told the state of Utah that it could no longer erect crosses by the side of the highway memorializing state troopers who have died. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 11:06 pm
On the conflict between belief and freedom of expression, they list: Higgs v Farmor’s School; Randall v Trent College; Corby v Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service; Miller v University of Bristol; and Lister v New College Swindon. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:37 pm
And there’s the case of “Ramos v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:48 am
As the Supreme Court of Canada rightly stated in Hill v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:16 am
Lord Toulson stated that considering the principles of Target Holdings v Redfern, a monetary reward which reflects neither loss caused nor profit gained by the wrongdoer, such as the one argued by the appellant, would be penal. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:45 am
In respect of the former, his Lordship referred inter alia to the decisions in Sentges v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
In the alternative – if that analysis was wrong – the judge found that the decision to make and affirm the Order must be part of a process of determination of the bank’s civil rights of the kind analysed by Lord Clyde in R (Alconbury) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] 2 AC 295 in paragraphs 145 to 160. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:05 am
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Carnwath stated that Asset Land’s activities amounted to operating “collective investment schemes” under section 235 of the 2000 Act, and were thus “regulated activities” for the purpose of section 19. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:53 am
Lord Mance gave the lead judgment, with which the other Justices agreed. [read post]
