Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 4,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
The Listings state that the 20ft Aluminium Flagpoles the consumers are considering purchasing are 'by DesignElements'. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm
DA & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2017) EWHC 1446 (Admin) This was the judicial review of the ‘reduced’ benefit cap – £20,000 pa outside London, £23,000 in London, brought by claimants who were all single mothers with children, including children under two years old. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
25 Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
” Packingham v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
In line with his earlier judgment in Hesham Ali (case comment here), Lord Reed rejected the Secretary of State’s submissions that in cases of non-settled migrants, the question is whether the state owed them a positive obligation to grant leave to remain, rather than whether there had been an interference with art 8 which could be justified. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am
Image: Flickr.com R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42 In a nutshell The Government’s flagship scheme to deport foreign criminals first and hear their appeals later was ruled by the Supreme Court to be incompatible with the appellants’ right to respect for their private and family life (reversing the decision below). [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:58 am
Lord Kerr and Baroness Hale gave dissenting judgments. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:37 am
So says the Court of Appeal in its reasons for decision in Biancaniello v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
United States, 365 U. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm
This is the rule of exhaustion.In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm
” As it happens, the case involved cartridges sold by Lexmark both in the United States and overseas. [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:01 pm
” It has been ever since 20th Century novelist Frederick Manfred, who wrote the acclaimed “Lord Grizzly” and 21 other works of fiction, came up with the area moniker. [read post]
