Search for: "State v. M. A. H."
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,791
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2016, 12:30 am
Williams's Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement before Roe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
In this regard, it is worthy to note that appellate courts in this State do not recognize governmental immunity as a defense where recovery is predicated upon negligence in the supervision of the care provided by foster parents to a child placed in their custody (see Sean M. v City of New York, 20 AD3d at 160; Barnes v County of Nassau, 108 AD2d at 55). [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:18 am
In interpreting a prior version of Act 312, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained in State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:18 am
In interpreting a prior version of Act 312, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 8:04 pm
“I’m looking for people who understand the way the real world works,” Clinton said. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
[H]e argues that the district court erred by admitting three exhibits into evidence because they violated the best evidence rule.State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
Indeed, she would have completely missed the recent unreported decision of Mr Justice Carr in the on-going Stretchline v H&M dispute (see previous posts here) had it not been gratefully brought to her attention by an eagle eyed reader. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:08 pm
Carpenter, Legislative Attorney; Edward V. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm
See McKoy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
Patel v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
Then-Chief Justice William H. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Dallin H. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:12 pm
Bushrod is known for, among other things, deciding Corfield v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
United States Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell, w [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
Article prepared by and republished courtesy of our colleagues Sanjay M. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
TaylorMelissa H. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Let's take a closer look at each of these steps.I'm sure you believe me on (1) -- that Central Hudson applied the four-part Central Hudson test.Similarly, (2)'s beyond dispute, and Judge Callahan's opinion says so itself: "On appeal [in Actmedia], we applied the test for laws that burden commercial speech set forth in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am
Sinclair, DVM1; Ryan M. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
As the balance of federal and state regulatory authority shifts, at what point is the “tradition” is upended? [read post]
