Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2020, 3:26 am
Lacteos de Honduras S.A. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:05 am
Mr Justice Arnold agreed, but also stated that the restriction was justified. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
YSL v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
In relation to inadmissible evidence the Court stated that the Board of Appeal rightly upheld the Cancellation Division’s decision on whether the applicant had adduced evidence of Red Bull’s actual knowledge of the use of the contested mark in Austria. and rejected the Asolo’s argument.Similarity between alcoholic drinks and energy drinksThe second plea, related to likelihood of confusion, which requires similarity between both the marks at issue and the… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm
The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision overruling its long-standing physical presence rule in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 10:45 am
District Court Judge Mark Wolf Issues Landmark 102-Page Opinion on Constitutionality of Massachusetts Eviction Moratorium; Gov. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 2:59 am
Roy, DO, PA v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:02 am
Instant Infosystems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:03 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
[1] Ohio in The State of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:45 am
The University of Iowa and The Board of Regents, State of Iowa v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:08 am
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Co Ltd and others; Nokia Corpn v Revenue and Customs Comrs (Internationak Trademark Association intervening) (Joined Cases C-446/09 and C-495/09); [2011] WLR (D) 349 “Goods coming from a non-EU state which were imitations of goods protected in the European Union by a trade mark or copies of goods protected in the EU by copyright could not be classified as “counterfeit goods” within… [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:18 am
This states that affixing of EU marks to goods or to the packaging thereof in the Union solely for export purposes constitutes use of a mark. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where goods located in a third State, which bear a trade mark registered in a Member State of the European Union or a Community trade mark and have not previously been put on the market in the European Economic Area or, in the case of a Community trade mark, in the European Union, (i) are sold by an economic operator on an online marketplace without the consent of the trade mark proprietor to a consumer located in the territory covered by the… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:42 am
The rule laid out in Marks v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:56 pm
Here is the abstract:Lingle v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 11:22 am
Brown ("federal court authority to overturn state judge's removal of a juror in a murder trial"), and the afternoon of Wednesday April 18 brings Panetti v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:35 pm
In line with the CJEU's decision in Nichols Trade Mark Application [2004] ETMR 48, and the UK Trade Marks Work Manual, the Registrar stated the principle that full names, as trade marks, are deemed inherently distinctive, provided they are not extremely common and the number of traders in the relevant trade is not large. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:33 am
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
