Search for: "State v. Martinez" Results 1201 - 1220 of 1,777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am by Jon Sands
Leyva-Martinez, No. 10-50269 (per curiam: Goodwin, Rymer and Graber). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 138843, Oct. 29, 2010) allowing an inmate to move ahead against one defendant with his claim that denial of his Odinist religious books and medallion violated the free exercise, establishment and equal protection clauses as well as RLUIPA.In Martinez v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Where emotional or other nonpecuniary loss is a direct result of a defendant's breach of duty, a plaintiff may recover damages for such loss (see generally Martinez v Long Is. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
By Ryan McCoy Following the California Supreme Court's recent decision in Martinez v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Here are my nominations for the 2010 Top Ten Church-State and Religious Liberty Developments. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] Raymond Deleon Martinez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for In civil cases, testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a... [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:01 pm by Bridget Crawford
LEAHY: Have you ever stated whether you felt that it was properly decided or not? [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Angel Martinez, Decker's chairman and CEO stated that:“The success of Ugg Australia has created an entire industry of companies that market their wares by deliberately confusing consumers. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 5:15 am
Martinez, 52 A.D.3d 68, 73 (N.Y.2008) (especially in light of prevalence of DNA data banks as criminal justice tools, “DNA indictment is an appropriate method to prosecute perpetrators of some of the most heinous criminal acts”); State v. [read post]