Search for: "State v. Stack"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2009, 10:59 am
The "E-meter" itself is said to cost anywhere from $900 for the Mark V up to $4,650 for the "Mark VII Super Quantum E-meter," which is apparently similar to the Mark V but with super quantum abilities. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:51 am
KF9685.A15 U55 at Classified Stacks [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:32 am
" Kyocera Wireless Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 8:25 am
It's a stacked deck. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:15 pm
Much of the discussion is centering on the impact of the 2005 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 7:37 pm
”In a second family law case, Basileh v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:23 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm
Aug. 28, 2009)(Jefferson) (workers comp claim; deadline for contesting compensability) STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:49 am
Judge Marcus wrote that the Court was bound by United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:04 pm
"But State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:29 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
State v. Outing and Change Blindness: Will the Connecticut Supreme Court Respect Empirical Evidence?
29 Jul 2009, 10:01 pm
The 'continuous innocent' (CI) walked down the liquor aisle and passed behind a stack of boxes, where upon the perpetrator emerged and stole a bottle of liquor, thereby resulting in an action sequence promoting the illusion of continuity between perpetrator and innocent. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:55 am
Stack v Dowden style separation of finances and unequal contributions). 3. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:49 pm
In Acosta v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:49 pm
In Acosta v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit) United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Franklin and State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:42 pm
The case caption is State of Minnesota v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:51 am
In Ginther v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:15 pm
There may be an interesting analogy to Topolewski v. [read post]
