Search for: "State v. York" Results 1201 - 1220 of 36,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2009, 12:36 pm
This is the statement of the New York trial court, in  Lincoln Life and Annuity Company of New York v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:35 pm by Sandy
 Because there is no controlling New York precedent setting the standard and because that standard is an important issue of state law, the Second Circuit certified a question to the New York State Court of Appeals, asking it to decide as follows:What is the standard for finding a defendant liable for punitive damages under the New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals rules that a plaintiff may have a claim under the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws that his former employer discriminated against him because of his perceived sexual orientation. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
End of Life Choices New York and the End of Life Liberty Project are applauding the ruling by the New York Court of Appeals to hear the appeal in the case of Myers, et. al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 5:45 am by Kalvis Golde
United States and New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:22 am by Karen Tani
The federal government took political, administrative, and procedural cues from the state immigration regimes that predated Chinese Exclusion, particularly those in the influential states of New York and Massachusetts. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:41 am by SHG
With respect to due process, “[a] non-domiciliary tortfeasor has minimum contacts with the forum State . . . if it purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State” (LaMarca, 95 NY2d at 216 [internal quotations marks and citations omitted]),“thus invoking the benefits and protections of [the forum state’s] laws” (Hanson v Denckla, 357 US 235, 253 [1958]). [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:00 pm by Cristina Mariottini
Still, the courts of different contracting States apply the Convention differently. [read post]