Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 20,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2017, 11:43 am
The Supreme Court itself gave Guantanamo detainees the right to challenge their conviction under that theory; it did so in its 2008 decision in the case of Boumediene v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:08 am
Here is a quick look at four big cases still on the docket. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:59 pm
If so, does the immunity still stand? [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
Way back in 1996, my wife Nicole Stelle Garnett was a young lawyer with the scrappy crew at the Institute for Justice, and participated in a challenge to the Maine tuitioning program that the Supreme Court just (finally) ruled against today in Carson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
(It’s still four Justices, not designation by SCOTUSBlog, required for a grant.) [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:58 pm
ShareIt has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 12:58 pm
ShareOn Thursday, the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
The arguments were raised in the matter of Com. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
.- Moliere, 1622-1673I suppose in criminal law it happens more often than in other disciplines, but it is still relatively rare for a lawyer to read a judgment and immediately know that it will in time be seen as one of the most influential cases in Canadian law.I am sure I do not overstate the epiphany that is the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:51 am
Supreme Court granted review in Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:49 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal in London rendered a judgment in an Optis v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 1:30 am
The key here is the word individual, which Justice Stark highlighted to meaning "...a human being" (as decided by the Supreme Court in Mohamad v Palestinian Authority). [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 1:30 am
The key here is the word individual, which Justice Stark highlighted to meaning "...a human being" (as decided by the Supreme Court in Mohamad v Palestinian Authority). [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:13 am
Fifth, Justice Kavanaugh explains that Justice Gorsuch's characterizations are not accurate: The dissent characterizes the Court's opinion in several ways that are not accurate. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:50 am
If the Court had retained the rule of Swift v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:55 pm
As the court pointedly noted yesterday, “The framework for analyzing excessive force claims is set out” in Graham v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
Kent v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 2:16 pm
Glossip contends that prosecutors violated not only Brady but also the court’s 1959 decision in Napue v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court granted cert in Merck v. [read post]
