Search for: "Strain v. State"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,919
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 5:28 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:21 am
Here's the facts of a very recent Iowa appellate court case that exemplifies the opioid abuse problem.Gallo v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:25 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
A similar dynamic occurred in the First Amendment context in 2010’s Holder v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:45 pm
Counsel for Wellcome put an article to Prof Molyneux which stated that the main advantage of additive combinations was the prevention of spasmodic resistance, and their use for strains that were already resistant to the more active drug was ostensibly irrational [84]. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Nor do I want to strain too hard against the judge’s criticism of the jury; though voicing it publicly in such a controversial trial may not be a step which makes juries better in the future. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
The court will “strain to give effect” to a mediation agreement. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
V. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am
Patients and caregivers desiring to purchase marijuana from another member’s locker could view the available marijuana strains in CA’s display room. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:14 am
Furthermore, the relevant inquiry under Thompson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:07 pm
See, e.g., Eagle v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 3:22 pm
The surgeon testified, however, that if petitioner merely had a low back strain, the EMG and MRI would not have shown the nerve damage and disc herniation. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
. to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:01 pm
The issue was decided in favor of the government by a Federal District Court in Texas in Texas Food Industry Association v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:54 am
Maybe… The age of drugs / Dalrymple (Illus. in: Puck, v. 48, no. 1231 (1900 October 10), centerfold). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:38 pm
Justice Freeman asked whether Tully v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:36 am
On January 23, 2013, a group of major universities and technology transfer offices filed an amicus brief urging the United States Supreme Court to affirm the Federal Circuit in Monsanto v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:17 pm
The surgeon testified, however, that if petitioner merely had a low back strain, the EMG and MRI would not have shown the nerve damage and disc herniation. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
