Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 1201 - 1220 of 21,969
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Even the notorious plaintiffs’ expert witness, Carl Cranor, could muster only a distanced agnosticism: “In Wells v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 4:21 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  This test compares the profits of the business “‘that are closely comparable to the plaintiff’s.'”  The yardstick test is often employed when the plaintiff “is driven out of business before he is able to compile an earnings record sufficient to allow estimation of profits. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
This test balances interests--i.e. the interest of the plaintiff in the forum, the interest of the forum in the dispute, and so forth. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
PREJUDICE TO THE DEFENDANT OUTWEIGHED ANY PURPORTED HARM TO THE PLAINTIFFIn response to motions made by the parties, in a case brought pursuant to the Child Victim’s Act, the Niagara County Supreme Court struck inflammatory language, which it viewed as “scandalous and prejudicial,” from the complaint, granted a request to seal the pleading, and directed plaintiff’s counsel to pay $750 in counsel fees and $45 in filing fees.On appeal, the Appellate Division, Fourth… [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:05 pm by Jordan Schmidt
The Court found that the plaintiffs satisfied the three preconditions of the Gingles test and carried their burden to prove that, based on the totality of the circumstances, the plaintiffs’ votes were diluted. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" North Dakota plaintiffs challenge redistricting plan for state legislative districts. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:26 am by Matthew Tokson
by Matthew ToksonA lawsuit recently filed in federal court alleges that Connecticut environmental enforcement officers strapped a camera around the neck of a bear who was known to frequent the plaintiffs’ property. [read post]
Gingles precedent which established a three-prong test to evaluate section 2 claims under the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:58 am by kblocher@hslf.org
The plaintiffs are represented pro bono by Latham & Watkins LLP and by counsel in the HSUS Animal Protection Law department. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
The court is not deciding whether the Rogers test is ever appropriate. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:16 am by Jon L. Gelman
Galvao fused two historical tests for resolving the liability issue in borrowed-employee cases -- the “control test” and the “business furtherance test. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:20 pm by David Bernstein
" Congratulations to the lawyers at the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, who represented the plaintiffs in both Nuziard and Vitolo. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 11:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Cline's secret was not discovered until 2015 after some took at-home DNA tests through an online testing service. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
Lower federal courts have adopted various tests to assess these claims and to render more representative legislative maps. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 3:30 am by Christopher J. Buccafusco
Kayser & Ming Hsu, From Scanner to Court: A Neuroscientifically Informed “Reasonable Person” Test of Trademark Infringement, 9 Sci. [read post]