Search for: "Three S Consulting v. US"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 5,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
The recent UK Supreme Court decisions in Thaler (Appellant) v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023]UKSC 49 and the US Copyright Review Board in Refusal to Register SURYAST are illustrative. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
As part of the hiring process, the employee underwent a three-day orientation and received a copy of the employer’s policy manual. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
Watts must prove all three of the La. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
This is the second of three posts assessing Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of an indictment against Donald Trump and two co-conspirators upon finding the Attorney General’s appointment of Jack Smith violated the Appointments Clause. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:03 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled three (3) hearings for the month of August, as listed below. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:47 am
In brief, if the Secretary of Defense (again with SecState concurrence, and DNI consultation) determines that a transfer is in the “national security interests of the United States”–for example, because it might facilitate an end to the Taliban’s insurgency–then two of the certification conditions (numbers (iv) and (v) above) may be loosened. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
She’s seemed, and to some degree remains, the most confusing candidate in the Group V race. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 6:20 am
CCC published the group’s findings in a report written by Rob Johnson, Founder and Director of Research Consulting. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:25 am
State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Its 2021 consultation on online harms was so badly received that it was quickly shelved and has required nearly three years to recover. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 11:03 am
When faced with a neighbor’s challenge to a land use permit, all project proponents should consult with an experienced land use lawyer about the issues raised, and especially whether the objecting neighbor has standing to appeal. [1] Although announcing the outcome of a case prior to issuing a decision is not without precedent, see, e.g., In the Matter of a Minor, SJC-12846 (Jan. 8, 2020) (adoption); Recinos v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:16 pm
Since so much of holding a jury’s attention is dependent on the exhibits, we’ll break exhibit technology into three groups:• Old school• Middle of the road• High techOld school hard-copy exhibitsMore cases are tried using hard-copy exhibits without the use of technology than any other method – even today. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:25 am
V. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:49 am
., v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
This post addresses three recurrent issues concerning eyewitness identification: When, if at all, is expert testimony about eyewitness identification admissible? [read post]
