Search for: "US v. Banks" Results 1201 - 1220 of 14,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The self-described “#1 fundraising technology used by conservatives” reported less than $2,700 in operating expenses since January 2019 despite processing over $2.8 billion in earmarked contributions, and $212 million in contribution refunds, during that period, according to the complaint. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 3:53 am by Paul Cartwright
  This was highlighted in an appeal against a medical negligence claim in the case of The Member of the Executive Council for Health, Eastern Cape v McAllister on behalf of ELM. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 11:04 am by John Murray
The SEC’s jurisdictional argument is based upon the “Howey test,” as articulated in the 1946 Supreme Court case SEC v. [read post]
In Philipp v Barclays Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 318, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the Quincecare duty does extend to cover account holders who are individuals as well as corporates. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:15 am by Tess Graham
We welcome readers to use the archive to follow the unfolding situation and generate new lines of analysis. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To access to the parking lot, the plaintiff had to descend some stairs, which were used by the public to access a bank and a store. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Jillian Moss
The bill would allow banks to issue their own stablecoins–digital currency tied to the value of currencies like the U.S. dollar—and allow for Federal Reserve oversight of stablecoin issuers who are not banks. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
It criticised the decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2018] EWCA Civ 1670, a decision that was later reversed by the UK Supreme Court: [2020] UKSC 13. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:41 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000Read More [read post]