Search for: "United States v. Clinton"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:31 am
Cases like Franklin v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:51 pm
Article II of the Constitution states that "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
"The idea of people proudly chanting anti-Semitic slogans in the streets is chilling enough; it is even more chilling that these protesters were grateful to the President of the United States for changing the political climate in their favor.On Friday August 25, as Hurricane Harvey battered Texas's Gulf Coast, and while public attention was diverted, Trump issued a formal executive order calling for the removal of transgender service personnel from the Armed Forces. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am
The bill was signed into law by President Bill Clinton. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
Finally, “embarrass” means “to cause to experience a state of self-conscious distress. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
In one case widely seen as destined for the Supreme Court - United States v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
It includes not only active participants in hostilities but also anyone who "purposefully and materially" supported attacks on the United States or its allies -- language that arguably encompasses anyone who sent money to a banned group or food to a combatant son. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
The term is connected to a number of other similar terms that seek to give meaning to the same set of practices or states of social being: for example, the German-English Weltanschauung) or perhaps “lifeworlds. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:43 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 12:06 pm
Democrats were very upset at Bush v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 7:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:38 pm
United States, , 518 F.2d 584, 587 (Ct. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:49 am
The clause says the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911)). [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:25 pm
Of course, given that, in the almost 30 years since a woman first ascended to the United States Supreme Court, we appear to have reached a plateau, with only two women serving at any one time over the past 16 years, perhaps my optimism is misplaced. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:02 am
This process is not bound by the strictures of the United States Code. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
McCain’s views may matter especially to Hillary Clinton supporters, many of whom are pro-choice; according to syndicated columnist Froma Harrop, “[T]hey’ll want to know this: Would McCain stock the Supreme Court with foes of Roe v. [read post]
