Search for: "United States v. Evers" Results 1201 - 1220 of 9,535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:22 am by Jennifer Liu
She noted at the outset that plaintiffs did not even make the argument that irrevocable liability occurred in the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:11 am
This introduction almost seems deliberately baiting.Judge O'Scannlain begins his opinion with the following paragraph:  "We are asked to decide, among other things, whether an alien not lawfully in the United States may sue for monetary damages claiming constitutionally invalid detention. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:50 pm
Over at the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse argues that the results in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
Hudock's federal court dispute, which reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, alleged that the big pharma had discriminated against her in violation of the Americans with Disability Act (ADA). [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 8:41 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
United States: Very soon, co-host Steve Vladeck will be making his first appearance arguing before the U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 2:26 am
Although a party may rely on documentary evidence dated after its filing date to establish its bona fide intent at the time of filing, there was no evidence - other than the application itself - that applicant ever intended to use the SWISS GRILL mark in the United States. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:00 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) A petition for certiorari was recently filed asking the Supreme Court to review United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm by Quinta Jurecic
If the court revokes the preliminary injunction, he says, what happens if Doe is then transferred and seeks to return to the United States? [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
NAB’s registration statement in the United States, for example, pertained to “ordinary shares” (At page 58 of the Supplemental Joint Appendix in Morrison v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm by Sam Eichner
In her concurrence, Justice Ginsburg cited to the proposition that “lawfully made under this title” must mean “lawfully made in the United States,” as it is found in §109 of the Act. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 pm by James R. Marsh
Both ERJ and LMB erroneously believed that Cambodian children could not be adopted in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:54 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States (No. 09-11311), the Court threw this understanding into doubt, suggesting a considerably more expansive interpretation of the residual clause. [read post]