Search for: "United States v. Felt"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Since then she’s been refused certain spousal benefits and is required to pay inheritance taxes on Underwood’s estate; issues which, ironically, are nearly identical to those raised by Edith Winsor in the seminal same-sex marriage case, United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am
The United States also slapped sanctions on entities based in China, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 3:09 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
The issue sand standard are thus considerably different from that of the United States but may provide insight. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 7:57 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
So what is the law of female toplessness in the United States? [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Thornton, supra) (emphasis added). [8] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:14 pm
Not so in the United States where Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Martha Stewart and others faced charges, not for steroid use or securities fraud, but for lying. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 9:06 am
Colvin, August 19, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Mays v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
As a matter of fact, the United States Supreme Court has `frequently approved warrantless seizures of property . . . for the time necessary to secure a warrant, where a warrantless search was either held to be or likely would have been impermissible. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 11:17 am
United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:08 am
Forty-one of the 47 state members of the HRC nevertheless voted to accept it; the sole negative vote came from the United States, while the five abstentions came from India, Kenya, Ethiopia, Paraguay and Macedonia. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:07 am
Department of Labor’s tests for determining this issue In Glatt v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 3:45 pm
Even the United States Supreme Court, I've discovered, has called it the "California District Court of Appeals," and has done so a half-dozen times. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:12 am
"This is the "increased risk" doctrine that several other states embrace.The "increased risk" test was the prevalent standard for compensation in the United States 40 years ago, but most states use "positional risk" standard, which applies a presumption that an injury "arises out of" employment if it occurs while the employee is at work. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:36 pm
Unites States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The parties need to recognize the mutual value of cooperation; the Court cannot define it for every family unit. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
