Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 1201 - 1220 of 5,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Judge Baer) held that these claims were precluded under Morrison because the plaintiffs’ transactions were the functional equivalent of transactions in VW stock, which was not traded in the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
" I ran across it this morning as I was preparing to teach United States Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am by Nabiha Syed
The Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:16 am by Ben Vernia
The case involved a scheme to fix prices on contracts for shipping the household goods of military service members both between the United States and Germany, and within Europe. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
The price depended on the quantity available and quality. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
Issue: (1) Whether a cartel’s delivery of price-fixed goods overseas for incorporation into finished products imported directly to the United States is immune from private suit under U.S. antitrust law; and (2) whether, absent special circumstances, a motions panel may assign itself to decide the merits of a case. [read post]
Moreover, in his opinion, these types of lawsuit violated rights guaranteed by the United States and North Carolina constitutions. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 10:32 am by James Hamilton
One obvious provision is Section 604, which amends the Bank Holding Company Act to direct the Federal Reserve to consider, when it evaluates an application for approval of a proposed acquisition, merger, or consolidation, whether it would result in greater or more concentrated risks to the stability of the United States banking or financial system. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Might as well be a baby driving...In his recent Luzerne County decision in the case of Gugliotti v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by admin
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether federal law prohibiting discrimination in the workplace applies to gay and transgender employees. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]