Search for: "United States v. York" Results 1201 - 1220 of 14,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
But the Court nevertheless took the narrow route, holding unanimously that the sixty-day window for filing a notice of appeal only applies when the United States has formally intervened in the action. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm
Now because the United States likes to protect its citizens' rights (as does New York!) [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” In light of Reeves, pre-trial suppression motions should seek suppression of identification testimony, in part, on the ground that the proffered testimony was unreliable and conducive to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification in violation of ... the Constitution of New York State and the United States Constitution and cited Reeves. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 3:56 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorney Sharon Cohen Levin, asset forfeiture unit chief in the southern district of New York, describes the government's investigation in court papers filed in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:55 pm
Filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the Complaint alleged that Herman Miller used its Suggested Retail Price policy to enforce a resale price maintenance scheme over the Aeron chairs. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Ben
" The Court of Appeals determined that New York common law does not recognise a "public performance right" in their decision in Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
United States, covering a president’s official acts, to this case. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:26 am by Cormac Early
United States continued yesterday. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:02 pm by admin
  City Council Speaker and Forum guest Christine Quinn today praised Edith Windsor, defendant in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 6:19 am by Joel R. Brandes
The return of the children would  not moot Respondent’s appeal to the Second Circuit, see Chafin, 568 U.S. at 180, and were the Court’s decision to be reversed she should be able to bring the children back to the United States, since she retained temporary guardianship of them in the Dominican Republic. [read post]