Search for: "Wages v. State"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 8,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2015, 10:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:38 am
Glatt v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:16 am
Russell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:22 pm
In a recent decision, Rajan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
Turnage v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
Canton v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:19 am
Each state’s program differs, and employers who are interested in taking advantage of this option should review the relevant states’ unemployment agency sites and consult with legal counsel for further information. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 9:51 am
Facts: This case (Acosta v. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 6:43 am
Supreme Court ruling in Anderson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 11:58 am
Most of these home-care workers receive the state minimum wage of less than $10 per hour, so they are not in a position to go without pay for a month. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:04 am
By Bill Milani, Jeff Landes, Susan Gross Sholinsky and Anna Cohen We previously advised that the New York State Department of Labor ("DOL") had taken the stance that in order to comply with Section 195(1) of the New York State Labor Law (i.e., to provide proper notice to employees of their wages, overtime rates (if applicable) and paydays), employers would be required to utilize the DOL’s official forms, which could be accessed at the DOL’s Web site.… [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
(When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 12:41 pm
In the 2005 Supreme Court case, IBP v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
The Court of Appeal in Arechiga v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
In Ghazaryan v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 pm
P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:54 pm
App., March 29, 2018) (setting aside order finding police officers were employees of the FBAC: the proper question is whether the officers are independent of the FBAC, not whether they are independent of any other party)Wages*Johnson v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 8:15 pm
WAGES*Evans v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:37 am
In Crenshaw, et. al, v. [read post]
