Search for: "Will Baude"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2013, 10:30 am
(Will Baude) It’s not every day that you read a published appellate opinion that says “evidence at trial in this case was not sufficient to satisfy the jurisdictional element of the offense of conviction,” and then goes on to affirm the conviction. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 10:34 pm
(Will Baude) These days it has become more and more common for those who are interested in becoming law professors to pursue an academic “fellowship” first, spending 1-2 years in the academy reading and writing before going on the tenure-track job market. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
My colleague Will Baude has some interesting comments. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 8:49 am
[Brackets supplied.]Baude suggests another class of applicants potentially entitled to benefits; civil unions. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:50 pm
(Will Baude) Chris Geidner (my go-to source these days for post-DOMA legal developments) reports that the Social Security Administration has now developed policies for paying benefits to couples in same-sex marriages. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:07 pm
(Will Baude) Shon Hopwood may be the most famous law student currently enrolled at the University of Washington. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:11 am
Rick Garnett suggested recently in this space that it is “obvious” (Rick’s word) that legal entities have Free Exercise rights, and Will Baude has written a bit more cautiously that churches “or the real parties in interest behind them” probably can assert their own first amendment claims. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:50 pm
(Will Baude) I’ve seen some skeptical responses to my previous post about corporations and free exercise, of which Dahlia Lithwick’s and David Gans’s are emblematic. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:59 pm
(Will Baude) While I am reprising themes from prior posts, I thought I would also note that the Fifth Circuit heard argument today in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:32 pm
(Will Baude) Last week, I had a post that was skeptical of the claim that current law requires the federal government to recognize state civil unions as marriages. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 4:40 am
(Will Baude) I’ve seen several links to the Washingtonian piece on Supreme Court signing bonuses. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 9:06 pm
(Will Baude) IU Law Professor Steve Sanders has a post on the ACS Blog discussing Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:08 pm
(Will Baude) A commenter to my last DOMA/choice-of-law post asks– why not just have federal law recognize all state-law civil unions? [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm
(Will Baude) When a product has a “lifetime” warranty, what does that actually mean, and whose lifetime is it referring to? [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 11:17 pm
(Will Baude) Thanks to the ever-alert Chris Geidner, I saw this post-DOMA decision by a federal district court in Pennsylvania, which is a good example of how complicated the post-DOMA choice-of-law problems can be (and how hard it is to get them right). [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:41 pm
(Will Baude) The Third Circuit today split with the en banc Tenth Circuit (and less directly, some other courts) in rejecting a Free Exercise and RFRA challenge to the contraceptive coverage mandate. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
(Will Baude) Joey Fishkin has an excellent post on some of the many voting changes that previously-covered jurisdictions are implementing (or may implement) now that they are not covered by Section Five of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
(Will Baude) Politico has a story about Marco Rubio’s attempted sponsorship of federal anti-abortion legislation. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:54 am
(Will Baude) So the big Voting Rights Act news of the day is that the Department of Justice will be asking a court to “bail in” the state of Texas for preclearance under the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:45 am
Will Baude finds this omission to be more "about craft than substance," but why fail to mention this significant jurisprudential turn when it was a major component of several of the Court's recent election law cases? [read post]
