Search for: "Apple Inc" Results 1221 - 1240 of 5,452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Subsequently, the three dating apps in question were removed from Apple’s App Store and Google’s Google Play Store following the FTC allegations, showing the real world effects of mere FTC allegations, a response that might ultimately compel Wildec, LLC to comply with the statute (and cause other mobile apps to reexamine their own data collection practices). [read post]
Subsequently, the three dating apps in question were removed from Apple’s App Store and Google’s Google Play Store following the FTC allegations, showing the real world effects of mere FTC allegations, a response that might ultimately compel Wildec, LLC to comply with the statute (and cause other mobile apps to reexamine their own data collection practices). [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
PLS Financial Services, Inc., however, a federal district court and the Fifth Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in a proposed class action presenting the very same litigation waiver question under almost identical factual circumstances, 689 Fed.Appx. 800 (5th Cir. 2017) (per curiam).How should these cases be counted? [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:16 am by Broc Romanek
If directors get about $250,000 a year, and that’s an important part of their income, he added, “they’re not going to upset the apple cart. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
THE LODESTAR COMES TO ALL LONE STAR STATE COURTS Last month the Texas Supreme Court handed down an important decision on attorney’s fees in a case involving a dispute over a commercial lease. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
GuestKat Cecilia Sbrolli writes Seal the deal: Canadian court waxes off copyright infringement in Pyrrha Design Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
As if to prove Liptak's point, today the Supreme Court decided Apple Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:15 am by Andrew Hamm
We live-blogged as the Supreme Court released orders from the May 9 conference and opinions in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
The “foundational assumption of nominative fair use” is indeed that a defendant uses a plaintiff’s marks to reference that plaintiff’s goods or services as a means to communicate something about defendant’s own goods or services, whether it be compatibility (“our headphones work with Apple products”), comparison (“half the calories of Pepsi—and twice the taste! [read post]
10 May 2019, 5:08 am
Michigan Man Pleads Guilty To Running Apple “Empty-Box” Fraud Scheme (DOJ Release)https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndca/pr/michigan-man-pleads-guilty-running-apple-empty-box-fraud-schemeVan-Seyla Mork pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to one count of wire fraud and one count of money laundering in connection with his role in a refund fraud scheme against Apple, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:22 am by Unknown
The company, GT Advanced Technologies Inc., also is found to have misclassified more than $300 million in debt to Apple that resulted from its repeated failures to meet performance milestones. [read post]