Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 1221 - 1240 of 9,050
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2017, 2:35 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  This is Neal Katyal's quixotic effort to get the Supreme Court to reopen the question it settled 41 years ago in Gregg v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:51 am
The Arizona Board of Executive Clemency and the Arizona Supreme Court both refused to consider last minute appeals by Comer. [read post]
14 May 2018, 3:55 pm by Michael Ponzo
In 2017, the Arizona Supreme Court changed the scope and limits of discovery to “any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any party’ claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court decision on Arizona's controversial immigration law -- which some experts believe could uphold the most controversial aspects of the measure -- won't end legal disputes on the matter and instead is likely to ignite renewed assaults by the law's opponents. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm by Rick Hasen
Derek tries mightily to justify under the Purcell Principle the Supreme Court’s order allowing Arizona, in the weeks before early voting begins, to change one of the rules for voter registration in the state, but not all three of the… Continue reading The post Why Derek is Wrong about the Purcell Principle in the Latest Arizona Case appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:36 am by Howard Bashman
“Where Court Packing Is Already Happening: Four years ago, Arizona expanded its state supreme court; Here’s how it turned out. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:20 am by Jennifer Varughese
Supreme Court has weighed in on a growing controversy pitting individual states against the federal government on the topic of illegal immigration.Frustrated with what some have seen as as the federal government’s inability to control illegal immigration, states such as Alabama and South Carolina have enacted their own laws to deal with the issue.On Monday, June 25th, the Court ruled that Arizona had, for the most part, gone too far with their statute. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:44 pm by azatty
Gleason, Regulation Counsel for the Colorado Supreme Court and independent investigator on certain Arizona lawyer matters, at the Arizona Supreme Court, Dec. 6, 2010 This afternoon came the announcement that 33 allegations of ethical violations have been filed against prominent bar members. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:06 am by David Markus
Supreme Court to rule she has a constitutional right to have fish nibble on her customers’ toes and charge them for that.Attorney Clint Bolick of the Goldwater Institute said that’s the only path now open to Cindy Vong, owner of La Vie salon, after the Arizona Supreme Court refused last week to consider her plea. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm
This week the Supreme Court struck down part of the law while leaving part of the law untouched. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:55 am by rtruman
Supreme Court, 5-4, Tosses Religious School Tax Credit Case on Standing Grounds :: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:44 pm by Howard Bashman
“Libertarian Party tells Supreme Court state law keeps its candidates off ballot”: Howard Fischer of The Arizona Daily Star has this report. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 6:54 pm
"Supreme Court asked to rule in divorced gay couple's child custody case": Howard Fischer of The Arizona Daily Star has this report. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 10:48 am by Howard Bashman
“After Supreme Court rules against them, families in cross-border shootings turn to international watchdog”: Rafael Carranza of The Arizona Republic has this report. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 9:48 am by Howard Bashman
“Sandra Day O’Connor turns 92 as public turns to Supreme Court, abortion again”: Ronald J. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:35 pm
"Supreme Court to hear Zicam case; Matrixx fights efforts to force expanded disclosures to investors on drug effects": This article will appear Monday in The Arizona Republic. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:10 am by Rusty Shackleford
This argument makes some sense, but it doesn’t change the fact that anyone charged under the law will be tried in Arizona court, which will necessarily require a state court to determine if a person is in the U.S. legally or illegally. [read post]