Search for: "BAKER v. THE STATE" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Chief Judge Baker, Judges Riley and Judge Robb. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
The New York Times has this editorial in today's paper which states that the board is "disappointed" with Monday's ruling in Carey v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 10:34 am
Findley, University of Wisconsin Law School Patenting Games: Or, Baker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
At the WLF Legal Pulse, Jeffri Kaminski looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:55 am by Frank Cranmer
Background In A Health and Social Care Trust v A Mother Re (A Child) [2024] NIFam 4, SE, the child of a single mother, was placed in foster care by the Trust as a result of her mother’s mental state and drug misuse. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 10:14 am by Ria Tabacco Mar
While still a law student at Howard University, Murray argued that separate was inherently unequal, work that formed the basis for the landmark victory in Brown v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:11 am
On Friday, the Harvard Clinic filed a petition for certiorari in Baker v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:49 am
Law Review Article About Westbrook v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
 In 1972, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from the ruling of the Minnesota Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:11 am by Doorey
Dishonest Texts Can Create All Sorts of Legal Problems In the second decision (Baker v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The complaint, as augmented by the affidavit of Singh submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss, sufficiently stated a cause of action for legal malpractice (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; Doe v Ascend Charter Schs., 181 AD3d 648, 649-650). [read post]