Search for: "BROOKS v. STATE" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
Brooks, Judge Representing Appellants (Plaintiffs): Tad T. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
Brooks, Judge Representing Appellants (Plaintiffs): Tad T. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am by INFORRM
  In the same trial Charlie Brooks has faced embarrassing revelations about his pornography collection. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
Thanks to Kevin Brooks for compiling the cases in this post. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:48 pm
(ZDNet - A Developer's View) CLIPARAMA.com launches world's biggest video only search (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Details released on the Radiohead experiment results: a tremendous success (Techdirt) Disney EULA funny, but also a bit sad (Innovationpartners)   Canada Canada Election 2008 - a digital policy scorecard (Michael Geist)   Europe European Court of Justice rules database owners can prevent material from being transferred from… [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 7:34 am
Rognlien of Bowman and Brooke, LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 11:50 pm by Tessa Shepperson
R v Bis-Mil-Lah Enterprises Ltd – Luton Magistrates Court Here the defendant owned  two detached outbuildings of a property at 50 Brook Street which were being used as self-contained dwellings without planning permission. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
” Also last Thursday, in McCullen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, (IPKat), (IPKat), (Class 46), (IPKat), (IP Law360), Quanta – Supreme Court reverses CAFC decision in Quanta v LG Electronics; method patents exhaustible: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IP Updates), (Hal Wegner), (Patently-O), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Patent Docs), (Agricultural Law Blog), (Filewrapper), (Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Philip Brooks), (Philip Brooks guest blog), (IP ThinkTank), (Electronic Frontier Foundation),… [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]