Search for: "Ball v. State" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2007, 2:28 pm
We view that as an entirely separate ball of wax. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
See Williams, 549 U.S. at 343, 356-57; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:57 pm by Kedar Bhatia
Ball State University, was likely assigned to one of the two Justices who have yet to write a majority opinion for the month, but the question remains: Why did Justice Ginsburg author two opinions for December? [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 1:13 pm
  But this court was on the ball and, in our view, came to the right conclusion on these facts. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
| IPEC on infringement of escort pictures and targeted public | Jeremy’s take on the IP Big Picture | Merpel on the EPO finances | AG Bot on Spanish claim against Unitary Patent | The General Court in TM cases Case T-342/12 and Joined Cases T-122/13, T-123/13 and T-77/13 | Court of Appeal for England and Wales on software patent | CJEU rules over Golden Balls v Ballon D’Or | IP on the airplanes and airport | Do TMs protect consumers or its owner? [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 2:35 am by Aaron L. Nielson
This week’s case that has drawn the most attention is United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 2:35 am by Aaron L. Nielson
This week’s case that has drawn the most attention is United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by WIMS
But officials warn tar balls could start hitting area beaches by tomorrow. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:39 pm by Josh Blackman
(Sounds a lot like the rule at issue in New York State Rifle Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:54 am by Jamison Koehler
 As the Massachusetts Supreme Court put it so well in Goodridge v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:14 am
This is the interesting question that the US Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit recently addressed in Rentmeester v Nike. [read post]