Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 1221 - 1240 of 14,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
In other words, they can throw the entire issue back to the District of Columbia (which is not a State of the United States) or to the States. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:55 am
  Remember insurance is a voluntary business and if David Rosmiller is correct that State Farm was surprised its recent Katrina verdict (Broussard v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:59 am
The case that the Court agreed on Sept. 25 to hear is Baze v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:49 am by Eugene Volokh
The Proposed Second Amended Complaint, therefore, does not allege sufficient facts to state a Second Amendment claim capable of surviving a motion to dismiss. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
[IPKat comment: 2 huge problems with this - (1) all these factors go towards showing that there's a link between the marks, but they don't really show that the link has 'rubbed off' on the later mark to give its owner an unfair advantage; (2) these are the factors that were used in relation to detriment to distinctive character, but the court has just said that these are two different types of harm; (3) the ECJ in Intel v CPM said such factors are insufficient for… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:08 pm
  “The insured bears the initial burden of showing that there is coverage, while the insurer bears the burden of proving the applicability of any exclusions in the policy. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am by CMS
On 29 April 2020, the UK Supreme Court ruled in R (on the application of Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd & Anor) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2020] UKSC 16 that the Secretary of State’s guidance prohibiting the local authorities who administer the local government pension scheme from making investments contrary to UK foreign or UK defence policy was unlawful as it did not fall within the power conferred by Parliament on the… [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:10 am
Precisely because it came on the heels of the Supreme Court's 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court took up the "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" question in Voisine v. [read post]