Search for: "Blake v. Blake" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,405
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2007, 9:53 am
Amidst lots of thoughtful sentencing work by Sixth Circuit judges recently (examples here and here), Judge Martin's dissent in Valentine v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:08 am
The latest example of these realities comes from the Ninth Circuit work today in US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:23 am
Blake (not approved for publication).On consideration of a claim by the plaintiff ("Erachem") to vacate an arbitration award entered in favor of United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC Local 12517-04 (the "Union"), and the Union's counterclaim to affirm the award, the judge DENIED Erachem's motion, and GRANTED the Union's motion.A member of the Union… [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
Holland's subsequent amendments resulted with the following claims: breach of contract (count II); breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing (count III); false light (invasion of privacy) (count IV); unfair and deceptive trade practices (count V); violation of the Lanham Act (count VI); and unjust enrichment/restitution (count VII). [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:10 am
  As Lyle Denniston notes, now the earliest-argued case still undecided is "James v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:06 am
Filed March 30, 2007 --Opinion by Judge Catherine BlakeWard, an inmate at the Western Correctional Institution ("WCI"), alleged that medical personnel at WCI had denied him medical treatment and housing for his complaints regarding knee and lower back problems related to an old automobile accident. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:02 am
Filed March 30, 2007 --Opinion by Judge Catherine BlakeTyrone Sykes sued the defendants, Officers Phillips and Alessandrini for violations of federal and state law arising out of a scuffle during his arrest for criminal trespass in Salisbury, Maryland. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
State of Indiana - "Specifically, Kazmier argues that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction, and (2) the trial court's domestic violence determination constituted judicial factfinding in violation of the rule announced in Blakely v. [read post]