Search for: "CF-3"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2017, 4:31 pm
BIO 7–12; cf. this Court’s Rule 15.2. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 7:25 am
Cf. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:36 pm
Cf. 21 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm
Id. at 665, but cf. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
, 51 AD3d 775; cf. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Specialty drugs (including Biosimilars) for treating MS, CF, hepatitis, cancer are expected expansion areas. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
B-3 (“BIA”), which provides that a discharge releases a bankrupt from all claims provable in bankruptcy. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 2:11 am
Cf. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
T 999/93 [3] and, for an Opposition Division, T 390/86 [7]). [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Because rigid adherence to Saucier departs from the general rule of constitutional avoidance, cf., e.g., Scott v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:46 pm
An effect that says “Until end of turn, target land becomes a 3/3 creature that’s still a land” is applied to it (layers 4 and 7b). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
Lance International, Inc. v First National City Bank, 86 AD3d 479, 480 [1st Dept 2011] [dissolved corporation lacks capacity to sue unless in the course of winding up its affairs]; cf. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 12:02 pm
[W]e need not and do not address bans on religious speech in forums limited to discussion of certain, designated topics, cf. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:04 pm
Id. at *3.Issue(s): 1. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
KG (“NSN”).The Opposition Division (OD) had maintained the opposed patent in amended form.An appeal was filed both by the patent proprietor (Sony) and NSN.The Board examined the party status and the admissibility of the appeal:[1.1] As a matter of principle, the board examines the question of party status ex officio before dealing with the substance of the case (cf. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:49 pm
Cf. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Cf. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:09 pm
CF/CG [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
In this regard, the record demonstrates that Goodman’s conduct in the instant case did not rise to the level of malpractice as a matter of law (cf. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
Cf. [read post]
