Search for: "Canning v. State" Results 1221 - 1240 of 125,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 4:14 pm by Orin S. Kerr
[An important case on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"] Regular readers may recall my prior coverage of United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
The fear of a retaliatory prosecution is no illusion: The authors examine a recent Texas case, Villarreal v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 2:11 pm by Josie Forney
Other States’ Decisions: No Standing to Challenge the Rule Conversely, a federal court in Arkansas determined in States of Tennessee, Arkansas et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:44 pm by Charles Bolton
Project applicants can use TMUD credits alongside other various local, state and federal credits and incentives to attain financing necessary to complete their projects. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
Canales does not suggest, nor can we imagine, any morally innocent reason for him to decide to penetrate her. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiffs can, and likely will, appeal the jurisdictional ruling to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:50 am by Natalia Arno
His case and the cause of freedom that he has pursued so vigorously are testimony that Russian civil society and the international community can achieve results, and cry out for greater efforts on both fronts. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:35 am
United States [quoting the McDonnell case].In the McDonnell case, Roberts found that prosecutors had defined “official acts” too broadly; in the Trump decision, he took the position that prosecutors had considered the question too narrowly. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:55 am by Dennis Crouch
Back in May 2024, the Federal Circuit issued an important decision holding that a patentee’s use of Amazon’s patent enforcement process (APEX) to target an alleged infringer’s listings can subject the patent owner to specific personal jurisdiction in the alleged infringer’s home state – despite no direct contacts with that state. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
You can reach her by e-mail at ncahn@law.virginia.edu. [read post]