Search for: "Carter v. May" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,603
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 1:19 pm by Dan Parlow
Recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that settlements involving some but not all parties – sometimes called “Mary Carter agreements” – must be immediately disclosed to level the playing field between the remaining parties: Aecon Buildings, a Division of Aecon Construction Group Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:19 pm by Dan Parlow
Recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that settlements involving some but not all parties – sometimes called “Mary Carter agreements” – must be immediately disclosed to level the playing field between the remaining parties: Aecon Buildings, a Division of Aecon Construction Group Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The provisions of this paragraph shall not affect any obligation of the Contracting Parties which has already been undertaken or may subsequently be undertaken by them under any multilateral international agreement. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Lucy Middleton is a solicitor at Carter-Ruck specialisting in defamation, privacy and confidence [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
 As the feature explains: "A closely watched trial in federal court in Atlanta, Cambridge University Press et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
R (on the application of Gaunt) v OFCOM, heard 11 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Toulson and Etherton LJJ). [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am by Brian Shiffrin
In the years after the Court of Appeals decision in Stith three of the four Appellate Departments have issued rulings counter to the Stith holding, concluding that because it is the defendant's initial burden to establish standing, the People may raise defendant's lack of standing for the first time on appeal (see People v McCall, 51 AD3d 822, 822 [2d Dept 2008] lv denied 11 NY3d 856 [2008]; People v Hooper, 245 AD2d 1020, 1021 [4th Dept 1997]; People v… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm by Pace Law School Library
Jackson, Pace Law School commencement speaker, May 16, 2010. 28 Pace Envtl. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 am by cdw
This week’s edition is available: Leading off this edition is Sean Carter v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:12 pm by cdw
Following a long holiday weekend, here is the first look at cases from the next edition: In favor of life or liberty: Sean Carter v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
They were: Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (set aside on appeal) and DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (granted for seven days for anti-tipping-off reasons). [read post]